PDF

$20.99

$69.99
(70% Discount)

3 Months Access - $20.99 6 Months Access - $30.99 12 Months Access - $40.99

Online Engine

$25.99

$85.99
(70% Discount)

3 Months Access - $25.99 6 Months Access - $30.99 12 Months Access - $40.99

PDF + Engine

$30.99

$102.99
(70% Discount)

3 Months Access - $30.99 6 Months Access - $40.99 12 Months Access - $50.99

Getting Ready For Generative AI Engineer Exam Could Never Have Been Easier!

You are in luck because we’ve got a solution to make sure passing Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate doesn’t cost you such grievance. Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps are your key to making this tiresome task a lot easier. Worried about the Generative AI Engineer Exam cost? Well, don’t be because DumpsPDF.com is offering Databricks Questions Answers at a reasonable cost. Moreover, they come with a handsome discount.

Our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Questions are exactly like the real exam questions. You can also get Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate test engine so you can make practice as well. The questions and answers are fully accurate. We prepare the tests according to the latest Generative AI Engineer context. You can get the free Databricks dumps demo if you are worried about it. We believe in offering our customers materials that uphold good results. We make sure you always have a strong foundation and a healthy knowledge to pass the Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Exam.

Your Journey to A Successful Career Begins With DumpsPDF! After Passing Generative AI Engineer

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate exam needs a lot of practice, time, and focus. If you are up for the challenge we are ready to help you under the supervisions of experts. We have been in this industry long enough to understand just what you need to pass your Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam.

Generative AI Engineer Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps PDF

You can rest easy with a confirmed opening to a better career if you have the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate skills. But that does not mean the journey will be easy. In fact Databricks exams are famous for their hard and complex Generative AI Engineer certification exams. That is one of the reasons they have maintained a standard in the industry. That is also the reason most candidates sought out real Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate exam dumps to help them prepare for the exam. With so many fake and forged Generative AI Engineer materials online one finds himself hopeless. Before you lose your hopes buy the latest Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate dumps Dumpspdf.com is offering. You can rely on them to get you to pass Generative AI Engineer certification in the first attempt.Together with the latest 2020 Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate exam dumps, we offer you handsome discounts and Free updates for the initial 3 months of your purchase. Try the Free Generative AI Engineer Demo now and find out if the product matches your requirements.

Generative AI Engineer Exam Dumps

1

Why Choose Us

3200 EXAM DUMPS

You can buy our Generative AI Engineer Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate braindumps pdf or online test engine with full confidence because we are providing you updated Databricks practice test files. You are going to get good grades in exam with our real Generative AI Engineer exam dumps. Our experts has reverified answers of all Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate questions so there is very less chances of any mistake.

2

Exam Passing Assurance

26500 SUCCESS STORIES

We are providing updated Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions answers. So you can prepare from this file and be confident in your real Databricks exam. We keep updating our Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate dumps after some time with latest changes as per exams. So once you purchase you can get 3 months free Generative AI Engineer updates and prepare well.

3

Tested and Approved

90 DAYS FREE UPDATES

We are providing all valid and updated Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate dumps. These questions and answers dumps pdf are created by Generative AI Engineer certified professional and rechecked for verification so there is no chance of any mistake. Just get these Databricks dumps and pass your Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate exam. Chat with live support person to know more....

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Sample Questions

Question # 1

A Generative AI Engineer has created a RAG application which can help employees retrieve answers from an internal knowledge base, such as Confluence pages or Google Drive. The prototype application is now working with some positive feedback from internal company testers. Now the Generative Al Engineer wants to formally evaluate the system’s performance and understand where to focus their efforts to further improve the system. How should the Generative AI Engineer evaluate the system?

A. Use cosine similarity score to comprehensively evaluate the quality of the final generated answers.

B. Curate a dataset that can test the retrieval and generation components of the system separately. Use MLflow’s built in evaluation metrics to perform the evaluation on the retrieval and generation components.

C. Benchmark multiple LLMs with the same data and pick the best LLM for the job.

D. Use an LLM-as-a-judge to evaluate the quality of the final answers generated.

Answer

B. Curate a dataset that can test the retrieval and generation components of the system separately. Use MLflow’s built in evaluation metrics to perform the evaluation on the retrieval and generation components.

Explanation:

Problem Context: After receiving positive feedback for the RAG application prototype, the next step is to formally evaluate the system to pinpoint areas for improvement.

Explanation of Options:

Option A: While cosine similarity scores are useful, they primarily measure similarity rather than the overall performance of an RAG system.

Option B: This option provides a systematic approach to evaluation by testing both retrieval and generation components separately. This allows for targeted improvements and a clear understanding of each component's performance, using MLflow’s metrics for a structured and standardized assessment.

Option C: Benchmarking multiple LLMs does not focus on evaluating the existing system’s components but rather on comparing different models.

Option D: Using an LLM as a judge is subjective and less reliable for systematic performance evaluation.

OptionBis the most comprehensive and structured approach, facilitating precise evaluations and improvements on specific components of the RAG system.

---

Question # 2

A Generative Al Engineer has developed an LLM application to answer questions about internal company policies. The Generative AI Engineer must ensure that the application doesn’t hallucinate or leak confidential data. Which approach should NOT be used to mitigate hallucination or confidential data leakage?

A. Add guardrails to filter outputs from the LLM before it is shown to the user

B. Fine-tune the model on your data, hoping it will learn what is appropriate and not

C. Limit the data available based on the user’s access level

D. Use a strong system prompt to ensure the model aligns with your needs.

Answer

B. Fine-tune the model on your data, hoping it will learn what is appropriate and not

Explanation:

When addressing concerns of hallucination and data leakage in an LLM application for internal company policies, fine-tuning the model on internal data with the hope it learns data boundaries can be problematic:

Risk of Data Leakage: Fine-tuning on sensitive or confidential data does not guarantee that the model will not inadvertently include or reference this data in its outputs. There’s a risk of overfitting to the specific data details, which might lead to unintended leakage.

Hallucination: Fine-tuning does not necessarily mitigate the model's tendency to hallucinate; in fact, it might exacerbate it if the training data is not comprehensive or representative of all potential queries.

Better Approaches:

A,C, andDinvolve setting up operational safeguards and constraints that directly address data leakage and ensure responses are aligned with specific user needs and security levels.

Fine-tuning lacks the targeted control needed for such sensitive applications and can introduce new risks, making it an unsuitable approach in this context.

---

Question # 3

A Generative AI Engineer has a provisioned throughput model serving endpoint as part of a RAG application and would like to monitor the serving endpoint’s incoming requests and outgoing responses. The current approach is to include a micro-service in between the endpoint and the user interface to write logs to a remote server. Which Databricks feature should they use instead which will perform the same task?

A. Vector Search

B. Lakeview

C. DBSQL

D. Inference Tables

Answer

D. Inference Tables

Explanation:

Problem Context:

The goal is to monitor theserving endpointfor incoming requests and outgoing responses in aprovisioned throughput model serving endpointwithin aRetrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) application. The current approach involves using a microservice to log requests and responses to a remote server, but the Generative AI Engineer is looking for a more streamlined solution within Databricks.

Explanation of Options:

Option A: Vector Search: This feature is used to perform similarity searches within vector databases. It doesn’t provide functionality for logging or monitoring requests and responses in a serving endpoint, so it’s not applicable here.

Option B: Lakeview: Lakeview is not a feature relevant to monitoring or logging request-response cycles for serving endpoints. It might be more related to viewing data in Databricks Lakehouse but doesn’t fulfill the specific monitoring requirement.

Option C: DBSQL: Databricks SQL (DBSQL) is used for running SQL queries on data stored in Databricks, primarily for analytics purposes. It doesn’t provide the direct functionality needed to monitor requests and responses in real-time for an inference endpoint.

Option D: Inference Tables: This is the correct answer.Inference Tablesin Databricks are designed to store the results and metadata of inference runs. This allows the system to logincoming requests and outgoing responsesdirectly within Databricks, making it an ideal choice for monitoring the behavior of a provisioned serving endpoint. Inference Tables can be queried and analyzed, enabling easier monitoring and debugging compared to a custom microservice.

Thus,Inference Tablesare the optimal feature for monitoring request and response logs within the Databricks infrastructure for a model serving endpoint.

---

Question # 4

When developing an LLM application, it’s crucial to ensure that the data used for training the model complies with licensing requirements to avoid legal risks. Which action is NOT appropriate to avoid legal risks?

A. Reach out to the data curators directly before you have started using the trained model to let them know.

B. Use any available data you personally created which is completely original and you can decide what license to use.

C. Only use data explicitly labeled with an open license and ensure the license terms are followed.

D. Reach out to the data curators directly after you have started using the trained model to let them know.

Answer

D. Reach out to the data curators directly after you have started using the trained model to let them know.

Explanation:

Problem Context: When using data to train a model, it’s essential to ensure compliance with licensing to avoid legal risks. Legal issues can arise from using data without permission, especially when it comes from third-party sources.

Explanation of Options:

Option A: Reaching out to data curatorsbeforeusing the data is an appropriate action. This allows you to ensure you have permission or understand the licensing terms before starting to use the data in your model.

Option B: Usingoriginal datathat you personally created is always a safe option. Since you have full ownership over the data, there are no legal risks, as you control the licensing.

Option C: Using data that is explicitly labeled with an open license and adhering to the license terms is a correct and recommended approach. This ensures compliance with legal requirements.

Option D: Reaching out to the data curatorsafteryou have already started using the trained model isnot appropriate. If you’ve already used the data without understanding its licensing terms, you may have already violated the terms of use, which could lead to legal complications. It’s essential to clarify the licensing termsbeforeusing the data, not after.

Thus,Option Dis not appropriate because it could expose you to legal risks by using the data without first obtaining the proper licensing permissions.

---

Question # 5

A Generative AI Engineer is developing an LLM application that users can use to generate personalized birthday poems based on their names. Which technique would be most effective in safeguarding the application, given the potential for malicious user inputs?

A. Implement a safety filter that detects any harmful inputs and ask the LLM to respond that it is unable to assist

B. Reduce the time that the users can interact with the LLM

C. Ask the LLM to remind the user that the input is malicious but continue the conversation with the user

D. Increase the amount of compute that powers the LLM to process input faster

Answer

A. Implement a safety filter that detects any harmful inputs and ask the LLM to respond that it is unable to assist

Explanation:

In this case, the Generative AI Engineer is developing an application to generate personalized birthday poems, but there’s a need to safeguard againstmalicious user inputs. The best solution is to implement asafety filter(option A) to detect harmful or inappropriate inputs.

Safety Filter Implementation:Safety filters are essential for screening user input and preventing inappropriate content from being processed by the LLM. These filters can scan inputs for harmful language, offensive terms, or malicious content and intervene before the prompt is passed to the LLM.

Graceful Handling of Harmful Inputs:Once the safety filter detects harmful content, the system can provide a message to the user, such as "I'm unable to assist with this request," instead of processing or responding to malicious input. This protects the system from generating harmful content and ensures a controlled interaction environment.

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

B (Reduce Interaction Time): Reducing the interaction time won’t prevent malicious inputs from being entered.

C (Continue the Conversation): While it’s possible to acknowledge malicious input, it is not safe to continue the conversation with harmful content. This could lead to legal or reputational risks.

D (Increase Compute Power): Adding more compute doesn’t address the issue of harmful content and would only speed up processing without resolving safety concerns.

Therefore, implementing asafety filterthat blocks harmful inputs is the most effective technique for safeguarding the application.

---

Helping People Grow Their Careers

1. Updated Generative AI Engineer Exam Dumps Questions
2. Free Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Updates for 90 days
3. 24/7 Customer Support
4. 96% Exam Success Rate
5. Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Databricks Dumps PDF Questions & Answers are Compiled by Certification Experts
6. Generative AI Engineer Dumps Questions Just Like on
the Real Exam Environment
7. Live Support Available for Customer Help
8. Verified Answers
9. Databricks Discount Coupon Available on Bulk Purchase
10. Pass Your Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Exam Easily in First Attempt
11. 100% Exam Passing Assurance